Thats what my friend said even though iv been picking her up for the past two days. Everyone else tells me to keep picking her up so she wont bite me (wich she is doing) So is it true?Is it true that if you pick your hamster up before the first week that you get it, it can get wet tail?
Handling a hamster won't give it wet tail. Humans can't get wet tail and thus can't pass it on to anyone or thing. If the hamster gets it, it was from one of it's cage mates. Handling the hamster early is good so that it can get used to you being it's owner and being handled.Is it true that if you pick your hamster up before the first week that you get it, it can get wet tail?
yes and no......and depends on the hamster. Wet tail is diareha (sp?) and stress can cause it.....wet tail can cause dehydration and can kill your hammie. So if you pick her up to much you can stress her out, and she can get wet tail from it.
While some hamsters can tolerate it more......you *should* leave your hamster alone for the first week-week an a half to let it acclimate to it's surrounding and the noises in it...
she will bite for a while, but just try letting her know that you won't hurt her, remember most hamster cages are top opening so when you come in from the top, you look like a giant predator that is going to eat her! So just put your hand down in the cage, let her sniff you maybe place a treat on your finger (slowly inch it towards your palm over a couple of days), she will eventually learn that you aren't going to eat her....
it's called trust training...and goodluck.....keep many bandaids and neosporin handy, lol
Not that I have ever heard. But keep picking him up gently so he will get trust from you.
I'm not sure what ';wet tail'; is, doesn't really make sense. Playing with your new pet will make it more human-friendly over time! The best thing to do is keep playing with your hamster! Playing with the hamster in the daytime might also help keep it awake through the day so that it sleeps better through the night--and doesn't keep you up all night. Hamsters are nocturnal!!
No, it doesn't hurt them if you pick one up. Just dont let it bite you hard.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Is it true that after 7 years your negative credit is erased?
Does it just go away automatically, or do you have to call the credit bureaus to have them erased? Is everything clean slate?Is it true that after 7 years your negative credit is erased?
No.. Your credit is never ';erased '; Now, things can start to drop off the report after so many years, typically around 7 years, but sometimes it may take 10 years to actually drop of the report. Bankruptcies remain on your report for a full 10 years. Also, if a company sells your debt to another company (collection), it can show up another 7-10 years for the new company.
Your credit score is based on your past credit history. So even if those bad things drop off after years 7-10, your score will still show that there was once some negative activity on there. As you establish new credit lines and keep them current the score will gradually increase.
Hope that helps.Is it true that after 7 years your negative credit is erased?
The answer to your question is not as easy or as complex as some people make it out to be. The State where you you live, the policies and practices of original creditors and your own behavior make this answer vary.
In my opinion the 7 years is from the date of last activity on the account not necessarily your last payment. This can be affected by many things: Did the creditor sell the outstanding balance to a third party. Is there a judgment?
Also what are the actual practices of the credit bureaus? I am not an attorney but I believe that bankruptcies can actually stay on your credit report longer than 7 years from the file date.
In any event you need a qualified person to answer your question. I hope the following web sites are helpful.
Unpaid bills NEVER fall off your record. When you have a bill sent to collections, paid bills fall off your record after certain periods of time. Bankrupts will fall off after seven to ten years depending upon how many you have files and what state you are living in. Paid bills usually fall off your record around three years. Late payments on revolving credit lines which are kept open will always show up on your credit report. If you circumstances which stopped you from being timely with credit card payments, I suggest you pay them off and close them. After three years they will no longer show on your credit. Conversely though, any timely payments will no longer show either. You would have to decide which is the best scenario, and a lay person would have difficulty knowing how many late payments verses how many timely payments should affect your decision of keeping or closing the account. I suggest you consult with a credit professional. Not a credit counseling cooperation but an actual credit professional.
Mortgages never fall off credit, unless you had so many late payments or foreclosure and you request it be taken off after so many years. again, I suggest you educate yourself separate from Yahoo! Answers and/or consult a professional.
Good luck with your credit.
p.s. Don't be taken in by those sites listed above. If it sounds too good to be true it is. Listen to your gut and don't get taken by these internet scams. Look up a professional in the phone book and if they tell you they have a website all well and good, but just check with the better business buraeu before giving anybody money.
Bad credit never goes away. Ever.
Man! So many crappy answers! After posting dozens of messages here you would think they had read just ONE of them!
Yes, your credit will get erased. By law (see the links below for the Fair Credit Reporting Act), credit reporting agencies can only report items for 7 years, beginning on the date of the delinquency. After that it must be removed.
They will do this automatically. If you were to look at your credit report, it even states very clearly that it's scheduled to be removed at a certain date.
Now, the bad news (sort of). Just because it's removed from your credit report doesn't mean the debt itself goes away.
Every state has a Statute of Limitation law (see the link below). After that time, you longer have a legal obligation to pay the debt. That means that the creditor can not sue you in court. The can, however, continue to try and collect it, but they just can't sue you. The only way left to them is to harrass you into paying.
Read the links below, it explains it all.
If any of you collection agents reading this plan to dispute this, please supply a source for your information and quit Emailing me! I'm sorry if I'm spilling all of your secrets here!
Not everything can be erased. Some things like car repossessions or bankruptcy can be eligible for removal after a certain number of years. But, you need to write the credit reporting companies (all of them) and instruct them to remove the negative info. The websites for each of these credit reporting agencies can give you more info. about time frames for trying to remove negative or incorrect credit info., forms requesting removal, etc.
Bad credit does go away after a set amount of time.
Every state has their own time frame of statutes of limitations.
Do a search online and you can find a bunch of free information that will help.
Most is 7 years, some items are 10 years and all time frames are renewable if you admit to the debt or make an offer to repay or settle.
If it doesn't just dissappear from your credit, you can send the credit bureaus a request to remove it after the statute of limitations expire.
If the bill collectors call, deny everything and make no addmittance to the fact that you owe the money.
It will be a rough 7 years, but time heals all wounds.
IRS is a different story all together.
Your credit never gets erased.
Unless you do a bankruptcy.
Which you can only do one time in your life.
But then you have a bankruptcy mark on your credit for about 7 years, which makes it hard to finnance anything. (Car, Motorcycle ect...ect...) After it may be considered a ';clean slate';.
i think thats just with bankruptcies
Late payments stop negatively affecting your credit after 2 years. I'm not sure about bankruptcies or foreclosures.
it takes seven years for a negative thing, say like a 90 day late note on your credit report, to drop off. My husband has a stupid 90 day late on a card he got when he was younger that will finally come off next year. But, yea. it takes a long time.....
If you file bankruptcy, everything is cleared in 7 years.
Wow, why do people answer questions when they have no idea. Anyway, the last answerer, and a couple of the others toward the end are basically right. Just wanted to confirm that for you in the midst of all the wrong answers out there first.
Never a 'clean slate'. After a certain amount of time (10 years?)some may drop off, though. Good luck with that. Keep your credit good. It is hard to fix once it is ruined. Best time to start is now, and it's never too late.
Your negative credit is erased with bankrupty, as a reminder you should check your credit report with the credit bureaus every year for accurate information, making sure there are no mistakes, there are three major credit reporting bureaus to check with, sometimes it takes time to correct a error on your credit report. I would suggest consumer credit counseling, which can point you in the right diredtion. Having a foreclosure on your credit report is the most negative credit, one should do all you can to avoid a foreclosure.
No.. Your credit is never ';erased '; Now, things can start to drop off the report after so many years, typically around 7 years, but sometimes it may take 10 years to actually drop of the report. Bankruptcies remain on your report for a full 10 years. Also, if a company sells your debt to another company (collection), it can show up another 7-10 years for the new company.
Your credit score is based on your past credit history. So even if those bad things drop off after years 7-10, your score will still show that there was once some negative activity on there. As you establish new credit lines and keep them current the score will gradually increase.
Hope that helps.Is it true that after 7 years your negative credit is erased?
The answer to your question is not as easy or as complex as some people make it out to be. The State where you you live, the policies and practices of original creditors and your own behavior make this answer vary.
In my opinion the 7 years is from the date of last activity on the account not necessarily your last payment. This can be affected by many things: Did the creditor sell the outstanding balance to a third party. Is there a judgment?
Also what are the actual practices of the credit bureaus? I am not an attorney but I believe that bankruptcies can actually stay on your credit report longer than 7 years from the file date.
In any event you need a qualified person to answer your question. I hope the following web sites are helpful.
Unpaid bills NEVER fall off your record. When you have a bill sent to collections, paid bills fall off your record after certain periods of time. Bankrupts will fall off after seven to ten years depending upon how many you have files and what state you are living in. Paid bills usually fall off your record around three years. Late payments on revolving credit lines which are kept open will always show up on your credit report. If you circumstances which stopped you from being timely with credit card payments, I suggest you pay them off and close them. After three years they will no longer show on your credit. Conversely though, any timely payments will no longer show either. You would have to decide which is the best scenario, and a lay person would have difficulty knowing how many late payments verses how many timely payments should affect your decision of keeping or closing the account. I suggest you consult with a credit professional. Not a credit counseling cooperation but an actual credit professional.
Mortgages never fall off credit, unless you had so many late payments or foreclosure and you request it be taken off after so many years. again, I suggest you educate yourself separate from Yahoo! Answers and/or consult a professional.
Good luck with your credit.
p.s. Don't be taken in by those sites listed above. If it sounds too good to be true it is. Listen to your gut and don't get taken by these internet scams. Look up a professional in the phone book and if they tell you they have a website all well and good, but just check with the better business buraeu before giving anybody money.
Bad credit never goes away. Ever.
Man! So many crappy answers! After posting dozens of messages here you would think they had read just ONE of them!
Yes, your credit will get erased. By law (see the links below for the Fair Credit Reporting Act), credit reporting agencies can only report items for 7 years, beginning on the date of the delinquency. After that it must be removed.
They will do this automatically. If you were to look at your credit report, it even states very clearly that it's scheduled to be removed at a certain date.
Now, the bad news (sort of). Just because it's removed from your credit report doesn't mean the debt itself goes away.
Every state has a Statute of Limitation law (see the link below). After that time, you longer have a legal obligation to pay the debt. That means that the creditor can not sue you in court. The can, however, continue to try and collect it, but they just can't sue you. The only way left to them is to harrass you into paying.
Read the links below, it explains it all.
If any of you collection agents reading this plan to dispute this, please supply a source for your information and quit Emailing me! I'm sorry if I'm spilling all of your secrets here!
Not everything can be erased. Some things like car repossessions or bankruptcy can be eligible for removal after a certain number of years. But, you need to write the credit reporting companies (all of them) and instruct them to remove the negative info. The websites for each of these credit reporting agencies can give you more info. about time frames for trying to remove negative or incorrect credit info., forms requesting removal, etc.
Bad credit does go away after a set amount of time.
Every state has their own time frame of statutes of limitations.
Do a search online and you can find a bunch of free information that will help.
Most is 7 years, some items are 10 years and all time frames are renewable if you admit to the debt or make an offer to repay or settle.
If it doesn't just dissappear from your credit, you can send the credit bureaus a request to remove it after the statute of limitations expire.
If the bill collectors call, deny everything and make no addmittance to the fact that you owe the money.
It will be a rough 7 years, but time heals all wounds.
IRS is a different story all together.
Your credit never gets erased.
Unless you do a bankruptcy.
Which you can only do one time in your life.
But then you have a bankruptcy mark on your credit for about 7 years, which makes it hard to finnance anything. (Car, Motorcycle ect...ect...) After it may be considered a ';clean slate';.
i think thats just with bankruptcies
Late payments stop negatively affecting your credit after 2 years. I'm not sure about bankruptcies or foreclosures.
it takes seven years for a negative thing, say like a 90 day late note on your credit report, to drop off. My husband has a stupid 90 day late on a card he got when he was younger that will finally come off next year. But, yea. it takes a long time.....
If you file bankruptcy, everything is cleared in 7 years.
Wow, why do people answer questions when they have no idea. Anyway, the last answerer, and a couple of the others toward the end are basically right. Just wanted to confirm that for you in the midst of all the wrong answers out there first.
Never a 'clean slate'. After a certain amount of time (10 years?)some may drop off, though. Good luck with that. Keep your credit good. It is hard to fix once it is ruined. Best time to start is now, and it's never too late.
Your negative credit is erased with bankrupty, as a reminder you should check your credit report with the credit bureaus every year for accurate information, making sure there are no mistakes, there are three major credit reporting bureaus to check with, sometimes it takes time to correct a error on your credit report. I would suggest consumer credit counseling, which can point you in the right diredtion. Having a foreclosure on your credit report is the most negative credit, one should do all you can to avoid a foreclosure.
Is it true masturbation can reduce a mans penis size? Or even stop it from growing?
Now, I don't believe this, but someone told me that it did, I don't believe them... I still masturbate as much as always... but it doesn't look much bigger, even though every time I measure it's always a bit bigger... any ideas?Is it true masturbation can reduce a mans penis size? Or even stop it from growing?
Nearly all guys masturbate, and as teens most do it a whole lot. Don't see anyone quiting, do you. Masturbation is no different physically than having sexual intercourse, just using a hand instead of a vagina. Everything else is the same. But you never see a question asking if having sex with a girl would cause a penis to shrink or not grow enough, do you-- because there is so much misconception about what masturbation is. It is simply solo sex. So natural and normal and nothing magical or mystical about it.Is it true masturbation can reduce a mans penis size? Or even stop it from growing?
No, it is not true that masturbation can reduce a man's penis size. There are many myths about this all around the world and it is not true.
Masturbation can, however, affect male sexual performance. If the male body is used to achieving orgasm quickly, it will decrease the time that the male is able to engage in intercourse without having an orgasm.
Hope this helps!
No that is not true.
Masterbation does not have any cons to your body.
some people choose to do it and other just decide not to.
Nonsense
masturbation will convert ur bodyinto museum of dieses.
No, it is not true. Someone's pulling your leg telling you that.
No it's excise
Nope. That's a load of crap.
um no offence but i dont want 2 ant u anywayz no ur friend just wanted 2 see how thick u r
all lies
that is not true. It may grow some. I don't know
Nearly all guys masturbate, and as teens most do it a whole lot. Don't see anyone quiting, do you. Masturbation is no different physically than having sexual intercourse, just using a hand instead of a vagina. Everything else is the same. But you never see a question asking if having sex with a girl would cause a penis to shrink or not grow enough, do you-- because there is so much misconception about what masturbation is. It is simply solo sex. So natural and normal and nothing magical or mystical about it.Is it true masturbation can reduce a mans penis size? Or even stop it from growing?
No, it is not true that masturbation can reduce a man's penis size. There are many myths about this all around the world and it is not true.
Masturbation can, however, affect male sexual performance. If the male body is used to achieving orgasm quickly, it will decrease the time that the male is able to engage in intercourse without having an orgasm.
Hope this helps!
No that is not true.
Masterbation does not have any cons to your body.
some people choose to do it and other just decide not to.
Nonsense
masturbation will convert ur bodyinto museum of dieses.
No, it is not true. Someone's pulling your leg telling you that.
No it's excise
Nope. That's a load of crap.
um no offence but i dont want 2 ant u anywayz no ur friend just wanted 2 see how thick u r
all lies
that is not true. It may grow some. I don't know
Is it true that it’s the Mormons who are behind the attempt to get Californians to vote no on gay marriage?
What’s the deal with that? I heard it cost $25 million to have the ballot papers printed up and distributed to polling booths and the Mormons and the ‘Knights of Columbus’ (I’ve never heard of them either) are mainly responsible for raising the funds. Do the Mormons think of themselves as moral guardians of the west coast or something? Is it true that it’s the Mormons who are behind the attempt to get Californians to vote no on gay marriage?
Even Obama and Biden have stated they oppose gay marriage. This is not just about marriage, it is also about judicial tyranny. 4 judges overruled a vote of the people and 2,000 years of legal precedence. Is it true that it’s the Mormons who are behind the attempt to get Californians to vote no on gay marriage?
No... the Mormons are just one of the many groups that have been taking up the cause.
I think they think of themselves as Christians, and Americans.
A lot of people are concerned about the way things went down in CA. The people had already voted against it. The judges overturned and rewrote the law. That's not what the court is supposed to do... they are supposed to interpret the law.
I support same-sex marriage, but not the way the issue was handled in CA.
A lot of conservatives and religious people are afraid that if we end up with a liberal president and a supermajority of liberals in the house, there will be more liberals appointed to the court and this might happen again in more conservative states. I think it's a reasonable concern, the court overstepped their boundaries.
Most fundamentalists think they are the moral guardians of whatever. Of course they are wrong, but it is a waste of time to argue the point. The Mormons are fundamentalists in that they accept the Bible as literal and their dogma is that the world was created some 6,000 years ago. They are scientifically challenged.
The Knights of Columbus is a Roman Catholic Church organization that is socially active.
It is a real pity that this church has chosen to interfere with a matter that should be handled State by State!
Religion is the party who has made the stand that a marital union is a man and a woman!
BUT, that does not cover the fact that there are other partners that want the same concession! They are in love, and want to be together. I know many couples who are married! I know many couple who are NOT married! and the ones who are not married, outnumber the ones who are!
Why? Because relationships, and commitment are not defined by a damned piece of paper!
Mormons are not the moral guardians of anything, except their own salvation, and they should just stick to that!! And they should keep their religious opinions to themselves, and stay out of politics!
What this comes down to?, is that they are persecuting Homosexuals, by attempting to deny them the right to be legally joined with the partner of their choice! Something that the Mormons enjoy, whenever they decide to get married!
Persecution is something that they are very familiar with,%26gt;%26gt; even today!
Perhaps they should remember what that feels like, and back off, and mind their own religious business!
You watched Bill Maher last night, huh??
Got to love that guy! He calls them as he sees them%26gt;%26gt; Ethically, and politically!
Mormons are definately contributing to the vote yes on Prop 8 campaign. They have had letters read by their bishops in their weekly meetings. They have organized email and phone campaigns and they are currently behind the ';WAVE'; campaign as well. Apparently 77% of all the money raised for this campaign has come from Mormon families and not all of them from CA.
They were even organizing a phone campaign with the volunteers based in Orem Utah.
I do not know what level the Knights of Columbus' has gone to but you can be assure that one of the main contribuiters to this campaign is the LDS church.
SUPPORTERS have raised $27.7 million, including $1.4 million from the Connecticut-based Knights of Columbus (Catholic Men's Club); $1.1 million from Irvine-based Fieldstead and Co. owned by financier Howard Ahmanson; $900,000 from retired pediatric surgeon John Templeton Jr. of Bryn Mawr, Pa.; and $500,000 from the Mississippi-based American Family Association.
(Genesis 2:22-24) . . .And Jehovah God proceeded to build the rib that he had taken from the man into a woman and to bring her to the man. 23 Then the man said: “This is at last bone of my bones And flesh of my flesh. This one will be called Woman, Because from man this one was taken.” 24 That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh. . .
(Jude 7) . . .So too Sod′om and Go·mor′rah and the cities about them, after they in the same manner as the foregoing ones had committed fornication excessively and gone out after flesh for unnatural use, are placed before [us] as a [warning] example by undergoing the judicial punishment of everlasting fire.
Any religion who actually understands and obeys gods laws in the bible is against gay marriage ...
What are you talking about? The Mormons and Knights of Columbus paid for the ballots? Those are provided by the government, and no campaigning materials are allowed in voting places. It's illegal. You can't distribute Vote for this or Vote against that at a polling place. So if they did, they wasted a lot of money.
A Vote for 8 is a Vote for Hate
Please vote No on Proposition 8
wanna outlaw religious liberty in America just to be able to marry your unnatural union? why don't you look at what Palestinian muslims do to them, and why their unnatural ones escape into the Jewish state to not be persecuted for their perversion, and go protest them. Don't interfere with religious liberty, unless you want religion to be dictated to you.
It's true that they have contributed a significant amount of money to support Prop. 8, as well as telling their members to donate time and money to support it.
They think they're the moral guardians of the world, frankly.
Contrary to what Yahuwceph thinks freedom of religion means, it means that he CAN'T force his religious beliefs on others, not that he can. You don't believe in same sex marriage? Then you're free to not marry someone of the same sex.
We're only one of the religions and groups that are promoting Prop. 8. There is nothing wrong with what we're doing either. While religions aren't allowed to support particular candidates they can support ballot issues.
I don't know. I don't care. Christ is my King, so the man-made government of California, (where I live), doesn't matter to me.
The whole world is climbing into the hand basket, and all I care is that I'm no part of it.
Mormons are part of it. The KOC are a Catholic fraternal service organization. However, we have very many people here in Cali who aren't Mormons or Catholics yet they vote yes on Prop 8 too.
The Mormons are among those who are in favor of a normal, traditional marriage.
Are the Mormons supporting prop. 8?
Yes.
Are they the only ones?
No.
:]
If you are going to say that maybe you should list all the groups who are doing that I know you hate Mormons but you need to stop generalizing just one group like you always do
idk
All I know is I support the living tradition of family and a couple in love... thus I support gay marriage!!!
them and many other morally upright people(Amen!!!!).cost is no object if its right.God will provide if we honor him.thin hair
Even Obama and Biden have stated they oppose gay marriage. This is not just about marriage, it is also about judicial tyranny. 4 judges overruled a vote of the people and 2,000 years of legal precedence. Is it true that it’s the Mormons who are behind the attempt to get Californians to vote no on gay marriage?
No... the Mormons are just one of the many groups that have been taking up the cause.
I think they think of themselves as Christians, and Americans.
A lot of people are concerned about the way things went down in CA. The people had already voted against it. The judges overturned and rewrote the law. That's not what the court is supposed to do... they are supposed to interpret the law.
I support same-sex marriage, but not the way the issue was handled in CA.
A lot of conservatives and religious people are afraid that if we end up with a liberal president and a supermajority of liberals in the house, there will be more liberals appointed to the court and this might happen again in more conservative states. I think it's a reasonable concern, the court overstepped their boundaries.
Most fundamentalists think they are the moral guardians of whatever. Of course they are wrong, but it is a waste of time to argue the point. The Mormons are fundamentalists in that they accept the Bible as literal and their dogma is that the world was created some 6,000 years ago. They are scientifically challenged.
The Knights of Columbus is a Roman Catholic Church organization that is socially active.
It is a real pity that this church has chosen to interfere with a matter that should be handled State by State!
Religion is the party who has made the stand that a marital union is a man and a woman!
BUT, that does not cover the fact that there are other partners that want the same concession! They are in love, and want to be together. I know many couples who are married! I know many couple who are NOT married! and the ones who are not married, outnumber the ones who are!
Why? Because relationships, and commitment are not defined by a damned piece of paper!
Mormons are not the moral guardians of anything, except their own salvation, and they should just stick to that!! And they should keep their religious opinions to themselves, and stay out of politics!
What this comes down to?, is that they are persecuting Homosexuals, by attempting to deny them the right to be legally joined with the partner of their choice! Something that the Mormons enjoy, whenever they decide to get married!
Persecution is something that they are very familiar with,%26gt;%26gt; even today!
Perhaps they should remember what that feels like, and back off, and mind their own religious business!
You watched Bill Maher last night, huh??
Got to love that guy! He calls them as he sees them%26gt;%26gt; Ethically, and politically!
Mormons are definately contributing to the vote yes on Prop 8 campaign. They have had letters read by their bishops in their weekly meetings. They have organized email and phone campaigns and they are currently behind the ';WAVE'; campaign as well. Apparently 77% of all the money raised for this campaign has come from Mormon families and not all of them from CA.
They were even organizing a phone campaign with the volunteers based in Orem Utah.
I do not know what level the Knights of Columbus' has gone to but you can be assure that one of the main contribuiters to this campaign is the LDS church.
SUPPORTERS have raised $27.7 million, including $1.4 million from the Connecticut-based Knights of Columbus (Catholic Men's Club); $1.1 million from Irvine-based Fieldstead and Co. owned by financier Howard Ahmanson; $900,000 from retired pediatric surgeon John Templeton Jr. of Bryn Mawr, Pa.; and $500,000 from the Mississippi-based American Family Association.
(Genesis 2:22-24) . . .And Jehovah God proceeded to build the rib that he had taken from the man into a woman and to bring her to the man. 23 Then the man said: “This is at last bone of my bones And flesh of my flesh. This one will be called Woman, Because from man this one was taken.” 24 That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh. . .
(Jude 7) . . .So too Sod′om and Go·mor′rah and the cities about them, after they in the same manner as the foregoing ones had committed fornication excessively and gone out after flesh for unnatural use, are placed before [us] as a [warning] example by undergoing the judicial punishment of everlasting fire.
Any religion who actually understands and obeys gods laws in the bible is against gay marriage ...
What are you talking about? The Mormons and Knights of Columbus paid for the ballots? Those are provided by the government, and no campaigning materials are allowed in voting places. It's illegal. You can't distribute Vote for this or Vote against that at a polling place. So if they did, they wasted a lot of money.
A Vote for 8 is a Vote for Hate
Please vote No on Proposition 8
wanna outlaw religious liberty in America just to be able to marry your unnatural union? why don't you look at what Palestinian muslims do to them, and why their unnatural ones escape into the Jewish state to not be persecuted for their perversion, and go protest them. Don't interfere with religious liberty, unless you want religion to be dictated to you.
It's true that they have contributed a significant amount of money to support Prop. 8, as well as telling their members to donate time and money to support it.
They think they're the moral guardians of the world, frankly.
Contrary to what Yahuwceph thinks freedom of religion means, it means that he CAN'T force his religious beliefs on others, not that he can. You don't believe in same sex marriage? Then you're free to not marry someone of the same sex.
We're only one of the religions and groups that are promoting Prop. 8. There is nothing wrong with what we're doing either. While religions aren't allowed to support particular candidates they can support ballot issues.
I don't know. I don't care. Christ is my King, so the man-made government of California, (where I live), doesn't matter to me.
The whole world is climbing into the hand basket, and all I care is that I'm no part of it.
Mormons are part of it. The KOC are a Catholic fraternal service organization. However, we have very many people here in Cali who aren't Mormons or Catholics yet they vote yes on Prop 8 too.
The Mormons are among those who are in favor of a normal, traditional marriage.
Are the Mormons supporting prop. 8?
Yes.
Are they the only ones?
No.
:]
If you are going to say that maybe you should list all the groups who are doing that I know you hate Mormons but you need to stop generalizing just one group like you always do
idk
All I know is I support the living tradition of family and a couple in love... thus I support gay marriage!!!
them and many other morally upright people(Amen!!!!).cost is no object if its right.God will provide if we honor him.
Is It True The Green Jobs Will Cause Double The Unemployment?
A economist said it would, and all the economists I have seen on TV have said all this spending will only work short term, in a year of two we will worse off than now! If we get double the unemployment - we will be in a depression! This is scary!Is It True The Green Jobs Will Cause Double The Unemployment?
No, it is not.
I noticed your lack of any source, either valid or fox, which of course contributes to the invalidity of your supposed point.
Please do some research before posting misleading questions.Is It True The Green Jobs Will Cause Double The Unemployment?
If you want anyone to take you seriously you would provide links to these economists saying these things.
It would appear your statement is a gross distortion of a highly dubious Spanish study.
The study found that government spending on green electricity in its infancy was half as productive in creating jobs as private sector spending within established energy markets.
In 1900 driving a car was less efficient than riding a horse. But with new technology things change.
As such to extrapolate the figures from the Spanish study to all green energy investment in the future is baseless.
To then read ';half as efficient at creating jobs'; means ';double the unemployment'; is simply wrong.
I heard an economist from Spain who are using a lot of green technology say something to the effect that for every 4 jobs created by green tech about 10 other jobs will be lost. The numbers may be off a bit, but that's about right according to him. He also said that the green jobs are not very long term- I didn't quite get why they are short term.
It sounds to me like that's a bad trade off and will definitely increase unemployment.
So-called ';green jobs'; are largely blue-collar jobs building and installing facilities that then require virtually no staffing. Therefore, the jobs end.
Even the manufacture of things like solar panels and turbines for wind are highly mechanized and the assembly is high-tech, largely done by robotic assembly lines. These jobs require technical skills and are not the types of jobs that laid-off workers can move into without substantial retraining.
The biggest problem as far as jobs are concerned is that these energy sources will require fewer workers than the current sources of energy, so there will be far fewer people employed to generate the same amount of power resulting in net unemployment at lower wage scales.
Additionally, marketable and economical ';alternative energy'; is still years away. It's still in the research and development stages and far from providing any significant number of jobs.
The best source of immediate energy and employment would be the construction and staffing of new nuclear facilities.
The US currently gets about 20% of its power from nuclear as opposed to France for instance which gets more than 70% of its power for clean safe nuclear.
Why aren't we doing this???????
Also, we could explore and drill new natural gas and oil wells which would provide more than 500,000 new jobs and end our dependence on foreign oil and stop sending our money overseas.
This is a national security issue as well as a jobs and economic issue.
Why aren't we doing this?????
You are correct.
It is scary that nobody in Congress is using simple common sense.
bash should listen to the news more often. The recent study from Spain stated those ';temporary'; positions, boiled down to one permanent position for every ten; the unemployment rate actually increasing and the operations costly to maintain.
Going ';Green'; could put us further in the ';Red';.
Are these all those GREEN JOBS, that Obama is supposedly going to create... or is this a few that he is now saving.
notice how his promise of creating 3 million new jobs has simply disappeared.... along with a whole lot of his other promises.
Again, you made a statement without any facts to back it up.
Yes what will all the coal miners and oil rig workers do when they ban everything.
Green usually turns to brown around summer time in these parts. So maybe that`s the way we are headed economically too!
Let's just get all the oil now.
Repubes Tea Bag Repubes.
No, it is not.
I noticed your lack of any source, either valid or fox, which of course contributes to the invalidity of your supposed point.
Please do some research before posting misleading questions.Is It True The Green Jobs Will Cause Double The Unemployment?
If you want anyone to take you seriously you would provide links to these economists saying these things.
It would appear your statement is a gross distortion of a highly dubious Spanish study.
The study found that government spending on green electricity in its infancy was half as productive in creating jobs as private sector spending within established energy markets.
In 1900 driving a car was less efficient than riding a horse. But with new technology things change.
As such to extrapolate the figures from the Spanish study to all green energy investment in the future is baseless.
To then read ';half as efficient at creating jobs'; means ';double the unemployment'; is simply wrong.
I heard an economist from Spain who are using a lot of green technology say something to the effect that for every 4 jobs created by green tech about 10 other jobs will be lost. The numbers may be off a bit, but that's about right according to him. He also said that the green jobs are not very long term- I didn't quite get why they are short term.
It sounds to me like that's a bad trade off and will definitely increase unemployment.
So-called ';green jobs'; are largely blue-collar jobs building and installing facilities that then require virtually no staffing. Therefore, the jobs end.
Even the manufacture of things like solar panels and turbines for wind are highly mechanized and the assembly is high-tech, largely done by robotic assembly lines. These jobs require technical skills and are not the types of jobs that laid-off workers can move into without substantial retraining.
The biggest problem as far as jobs are concerned is that these energy sources will require fewer workers than the current sources of energy, so there will be far fewer people employed to generate the same amount of power resulting in net unemployment at lower wage scales.
Additionally, marketable and economical ';alternative energy'; is still years away. It's still in the research and development stages and far from providing any significant number of jobs.
The best source of immediate energy and employment would be the construction and staffing of new nuclear facilities.
The US currently gets about 20% of its power from nuclear as opposed to France for instance which gets more than 70% of its power for clean safe nuclear.
Why aren't we doing this???????
Also, we could explore and drill new natural gas and oil wells which would provide more than 500,000 new jobs and end our dependence on foreign oil and stop sending our money overseas.
This is a national security issue as well as a jobs and economic issue.
Why aren't we doing this?????
You are correct.
It is scary that nobody in Congress is using simple common sense.
bash should listen to the news more often. The recent study from Spain stated those ';temporary'; positions, boiled down to one permanent position for every ten; the unemployment rate actually increasing and the operations costly to maintain.
Going ';Green'; could put us further in the ';Red';.
Are these all those GREEN JOBS, that Obama is supposedly going to create... or is this a few that he is now saving.
notice how his promise of creating 3 million new jobs has simply disappeared.... along with a whole lot of his other promises.
Again, you made a statement without any facts to back it up.
Yes what will all the coal miners and oil rig workers do when they ban everything.
Green usually turns to brown around summer time in these parts. So maybe that`s the way we are headed economically too!
Let's just get all the oil now.
Repubes Tea Bag Repubes.
Is it true that shaving your face Makes the hair grow faster?
I was just wondering. Has anybody ever done a experiment or something????Is it true that shaving your face Makes the hair grow faster?
Old wives tale, It does not!Is it true that shaving your face Makes the hair grow faster?
I'm a nurse. Yes, and it also it worked for my brother.
NO IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT.
It is false that shaving your face makes the hair grow faster. Shaving does create hair with uneven edges and that gives the effect of faster growth.
NO! MTV used to have a show called (myth of fact) or something like that anyway they had the same question and it was a myth.
yes faster and thicker
well it's not true for my legs
nope.
I shave my legs and they do and also they grow in darker and a lot thinker it gets really sick so dont shave if u really dont have to..-- Happy New Year-- 2007!!
yes my b/f did it and he got pimples where he did that %26amp; his skin was always clear.!
yes and it also sometimes make it grow longer!!!!!!!
shaving anywhere makes the hair grow faster and darker.
Nope. It's an old wives tale.
No, your body does not even know the hair has been cut, so how can it respond by growing faster? The part you cut is dead. Hair grows at the predetermined rate set by your genes at conception, unless you are sick or undernourished.
No. Period. Its just a myth.
YEPPers it does make your hair grow faster and faster as you get older too!
Old wives tale, It does not!Is it true that shaving your face Makes the hair grow faster?
I'm a nurse. Yes, and it also it worked for my brother.
NO IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT.
It is false that shaving your face makes the hair grow faster. Shaving does create hair with uneven edges and that gives the effect of faster growth.
NO! MTV used to have a show called (myth of fact) or something like that anyway they had the same question and it was a myth.
yes faster and thicker
well it's not true for my legs
nope.
I shave my legs and they do and also they grow in darker and a lot thinker it gets really sick so dont shave if u really dont have to..-- Happy New Year-- 2007!!
yes my b/f did it and he got pimples where he did that %26amp; his skin was always clear.!
yes and it also sometimes make it grow longer!!!!!!!
shaving anywhere makes the hair grow faster and darker.
Nope. It's an old wives tale.
No, your body does not even know the hair has been cut, so how can it respond by growing faster? The part you cut is dead. Hair grows at the predetermined rate set by your genes at conception, unless you are sick or undernourished.
No. Period. Its just a myth.
YEPPers it does make your hair grow faster and faster as you get older too!
Is it true that post demolision of the Babri Masjid, a number of temples in India were pulled down?
I am not aware of this matter. Can someone who knows about it explain for the benefit of the readers? Let not one side alone be highlighted.
TRY TO BE FACTUALY CORRECT.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~鈥?br>
POSTED ON YA! INDIA. OTHERS PLEASE EXCUSE.Is it true that post demolision of the Babri Masjid, a number of temples in India were pulled down?
Temples means what ?? Term demolition can only be used when the big structure like babri masjid is razed down. See you find in every nook and corner in every city with a';SMALL STONE EGRAVED WITH ITS GOD OR GODESS';and you.can not say these as temples and if it is damaged or demolished for other civic reasons cannot be termed AS ';TEMPLE DEMOLITION';.since these are not templesIs it true that post demolision of the Babri Masjid, a number of temples in India were pulled down?
No voice is raised when masjids are demolished to widen the roads in Muslim Countries.
This freedom is given in our country only. Here the Muslims are hyper-sensitive or they pretend to be. Daily Fatwas are announced on baseless issues. In some cities they don't hesitate to put Pakistani flag on roof tops but but but...... we too have Muslims like Dr. APJ KALAM and there are so many like him. They feel proud to be Indian and India feels proud of them.
Demolition of Babri Masjid was an enacted play for political gains and will remain alive till the present communal breed of politicians is alive. None of them is secular.
Our temples were demolished, divine statues of our Gods were broken into pieces, statues of Budha blasted in Afghanistan but no one cried except Hindus. We also have sentiments but we do not make an issue. We want to live in peace so let us live in peace. Those who feel uncomfortable here may leave any time.
YES. NOT ANY MAJOR TEMPLES HOWEVER. MOST WERE EITHER STONED OR DESECRATED AND NOT FULLY RAZED DOWN. SAME WITH MANY MOSQUES AND DARGAHS ALL OVER INDIA. THESE TEMPLE/ MOSQUE ATTACKS WERE NOT REPORTED THEN BECAUSE OF GOVT.'S MEDIA CENSORSHIP.
JUST WENT OVER THIS REDIFF REPORT WHICH SAYS: ';On December 8, the rioting spread alarmingly and attacks on places of worship continued: ';Eleven temples in different jurisdictions were damaged, demolished or set on fire.'; (Police records show 42 temples and 4 mosques destroyed.)......';
ACCORDING TO ANOTHER SOURCE: IN KASHMIR, POST BABRI DEMOLITION -
^ MANY DHARAMSHALAS IN Uma Nagari (Bari Aghan) %26amp; Vethwatroo (Vetastha) WHICH WERE BURNT.
^ A SHIVA TEMPLE IN Verinag WAS DAMAGED.
^ Tirth Raj Asthapan in Anantanag WAS DAMAGED.
^ Durga Temple at Kakran WAS COMPLETELY BURNT.
^ Shiva Bhagwati At Akingam WAS BURNT ALONG WITH DHARAMSHALA.
^ Kulwagishiri Asthapan Kulgam IN KULGAM WAS BURNT.
....AND SO ON.....
Count the total number of temples attacked looted and broken in India, Pakistan and B'desh.
Mehdi finds small statues as nothing
What about the Babri structure where no namaz was offered for dozens of years (perhaps from during british times).
I just wish to know Muslim want to be recognised with BABAR or with APJ Kalaam ?
If they have more sympathy with babar let them go to pakistan.
BTW CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ONly Krishna temple in Lahore ????
The greatest genocide in history was perpetrated by muslims upon the peaceful hindus / buddhists at the turn of the first millenia. Upwards to 1 billion hindus / buddhists were butched over several hundred years of Jihad. I wouldnt blame the non-muslims of India for leveling every single Mosque on their soil. In fact, Im suprised they havent.
Unfortunately it is true.One of the main example was restoration of Somnath temple By None other then Prime minister Pt. Nehru.
and for facts go google and type temples destroyed by Muslims in India, you will find videos, blogs,historic facts wikipedia details, dedicated websites.
Edit-1 TO mehdi who supports jihad against gujarat public, just because they democraticaly elected Modi ,again shows his true communal face.Just look out his question below
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind鈥?/a>
no masjid was demolished only a dilapitaded and abandoned place.
If a sadistic pleasure of wrting the sentence 'a number of temples in India were pulled down' is derived, one cannot help it.
TRY TO BE FACTUALY CORRECT.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~鈥?br>
POSTED ON YA! INDIA. OTHERS PLEASE EXCUSE.Is it true that post demolision of the Babri Masjid, a number of temples in India were pulled down?
Temples means what ?? Term demolition can only be used when the big structure like babri masjid is razed down. See you find in every nook and corner in every city with a';SMALL STONE EGRAVED WITH ITS GOD OR GODESS';and you.can not say these as temples and if it is damaged or demolished for other civic reasons cannot be termed AS ';TEMPLE DEMOLITION';.since these are not templesIs it true that post demolision of the Babri Masjid, a number of temples in India were pulled down?
No voice is raised when masjids are demolished to widen the roads in Muslim Countries.
This freedom is given in our country only. Here the Muslims are hyper-sensitive or they pretend to be. Daily Fatwas are announced on baseless issues. In some cities they don't hesitate to put Pakistani flag on roof tops but but but...... we too have Muslims like Dr. APJ KALAM and there are so many like him. They feel proud to be Indian and India feels proud of them.
Demolition of Babri Masjid was an enacted play for political gains and will remain alive till the present communal breed of politicians is alive. None of them is secular.
Our temples were demolished, divine statues of our Gods were broken into pieces, statues of Budha blasted in Afghanistan but no one cried except Hindus. We also have sentiments but we do not make an issue. We want to live in peace so let us live in peace. Those who feel uncomfortable here may leave any time.
YES. NOT ANY MAJOR TEMPLES HOWEVER. MOST WERE EITHER STONED OR DESECRATED AND NOT FULLY RAZED DOWN. SAME WITH MANY MOSQUES AND DARGAHS ALL OVER INDIA. THESE TEMPLE/ MOSQUE ATTACKS WERE NOT REPORTED THEN BECAUSE OF GOVT.'S MEDIA CENSORSHIP.
JUST WENT OVER THIS REDIFF REPORT WHICH SAYS: ';On December 8, the rioting spread alarmingly and attacks on places of worship continued: ';Eleven temples in different jurisdictions were damaged, demolished or set on fire.'; (Police records show 42 temples and 4 mosques destroyed.)......';
ACCORDING TO ANOTHER SOURCE: IN KASHMIR, POST BABRI DEMOLITION -
^ MANY DHARAMSHALAS IN Uma Nagari (Bari Aghan) %26amp; Vethwatroo (Vetastha) WHICH WERE BURNT.
^ A SHIVA TEMPLE IN Verinag WAS DAMAGED.
^ Tirth Raj Asthapan in Anantanag WAS DAMAGED.
^ Durga Temple at Kakran WAS COMPLETELY BURNT.
^ Shiva Bhagwati At Akingam WAS BURNT ALONG WITH DHARAMSHALA.
^ Kulwagishiri Asthapan Kulgam IN KULGAM WAS BURNT.
....AND SO ON.....
Count the total number of temples attacked looted and broken in India, Pakistan and B'desh.
Mehdi finds small statues as nothing
What about the Babri structure where no namaz was offered for dozens of years (perhaps from during british times).
I just wish to know Muslim want to be recognised with BABAR or with APJ Kalaam ?
If they have more sympathy with babar let them go to pakistan.
BTW CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ONly Krishna temple in Lahore ????
The greatest genocide in history was perpetrated by muslims upon the peaceful hindus / buddhists at the turn of the first millenia. Upwards to 1 billion hindus / buddhists were butched over several hundred years of Jihad. I wouldnt blame the non-muslims of India for leveling every single Mosque on their soil. In fact, Im suprised they havent.
Unfortunately it is true.One of the main example was restoration of Somnath temple By None other then Prime minister Pt. Nehru.
and for facts go google and type temples destroyed by Muslims in India, you will find videos, blogs,historic facts wikipedia details, dedicated websites.
Edit-1 TO mehdi who supports jihad against gujarat public, just because they democraticaly elected Modi ,again shows his true communal face.Just look out his question below
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind鈥?/a>
no masjid was demolished only a dilapitaded and abandoned place.
If a sadistic pleasure of wrting the sentence 'a number of temples in India were pulled down' is derived, one cannot help it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)