Rumor has it that Palin wants to be on Dancing with the Stars after losing the election. She wants to cash in on her fame.Is it true that Sarah Palin had her publicist contact Dancing with the Stars for next season?
I could not find anything to support this but I am sure she is a better dancer than a vice president. Maybe she will find her true calling!!Is it true that Sarah Palin had her publicist contact Dancing with the Stars for next season?
HAHAHAHAHA you have GOT to be kidding me! though, if she really was on the show, i just might vote for her dances just because i hate her so much!
Yes, but she best do it fast as her 15 min are just about over
Friday, February 12, 2010
Is it true that Obama said something about ';clinging to their guns and religion'; during the primary?
Or, is this a right wing lie?Is it true that Obama said something about ';clinging to their guns and religion'; during the primary?
Well lets take it in context, it was at a San Francisco fundraiser (imagine that) and he obviously didn't think it would be heard by those to whom he was so condescendingly disparaging. Its shameful really, to be mocked for utilizing the freedoms that are guaranteed by this great country, but now misunderstood as some type of angry frustrated minority fringe outcast mentality by the liberal elite to be dismissed as not worthy of a vote.Is it true that Obama said something about ';clinging to their guns and religion'; during the primary?
Yep, it's true. He thinks it's wrong for the America people to have guns and religion. This is his way of appeasing the Liberals who think we shouldn't have weapons within our homes. I moved here to California (to be with my Marine husband) and discovered that the only way you can register to own a gun is if you've been attacked two consecutive times...And you can be charged with murder if you kill someone that's breaking into your home. Also, if you even injure them while they're in your home, they can actually sue you...Even though they broke in.
Liberals think all of America should be like California. It's a horrible thought.
Its true, in more ways than one, there is a certain element for whom education and intelligence isn't wanted or needed, they do cling to their guns and religion, they shy away from technology and science.
The fact that guns and religion are interwoven in their thinking is key.
He wasn't putting down gun owners or people who believe in the bible, just the people who have nothing else they believe in.
He said: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And it’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Basically he called them Bible thumping, gun toting, racist hicks.
Totally true, and said in a forum where he was DUMB ENOUGH to think there weren't any cameras running.
It was Mr. Elitist's way of talking down about your ';common folk'; who he claims to represent when he's in your town..... and then who he basically calls rednecks when he's with his Hollywood supporters.
If you took ANY time at all to research Obama, there's no way you could ever support him......
I guess you are just now joining us.
As you will learn...this is only one of several Obama gaffs. However, it's not widely publicized. Might have something to do with a BIG push by the news media to get Obama elected.
Listen to 'The Battle of the Headlines' on the Glenn Beck Radio Show. Absolutely Hillarious!
Full Quote..
';cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them”
Some how people ignore the last part of his quote.He was talking about small town uber-religious, gun toting racists...which I assume most of you are not. Right?
Now if you are a small town uber-religious, gun toting racist...by all means be offended by this.
I support Obama (at least compared to the lunatics on the other side), but he did indeed say this. It was actually used against him by Hillary to try and point out how ';out of touch'; he supposedly was with lower-class America.
Thing is, many people (myself included) actually agreed with it.
He was talking about the people who live in Pennsylvania...in a speech for ultra-liberals in California...during the democratic primary
Yes it is true. He said it at a private fundraiser in San Fransisco but someone taped it and released it. It was right before the Pennsylvania primary..
why would they lie. everything he said is taped by journalists.
Yes, he said it in San Francisco during a fundraiser. He was talking about YOU.
And John McShame was against MLK birthday becoming a holiday.
Not a lie, it came directly from Obama's mouth.
It's true, but I don't like clinging on to religion or guns anyway.
Agree with the above. I've seen the tape many times.
yes he did. the more he speaks the more foot he shoves in his mouth.
yep he said it about ';small town America';.
Yes, he did.
yes he did uit was a reemark about Clinton seeking the votes of bible thumbing gun owners
Jesus wants us to own assault rifles. It's in the Bible!losing hair
Well lets take it in context, it was at a San Francisco fundraiser (imagine that) and he obviously didn't think it would be heard by those to whom he was so condescendingly disparaging. Its shameful really, to be mocked for utilizing the freedoms that are guaranteed by this great country, but now misunderstood as some type of angry frustrated minority fringe outcast mentality by the liberal elite to be dismissed as not worthy of a vote.Is it true that Obama said something about ';clinging to their guns and religion'; during the primary?
Yep, it's true. He thinks it's wrong for the America people to have guns and religion. This is his way of appeasing the Liberals who think we shouldn't have weapons within our homes. I moved here to California (to be with my Marine husband) and discovered that the only way you can register to own a gun is if you've been attacked two consecutive times...And you can be charged with murder if you kill someone that's breaking into your home. Also, if you even injure them while they're in your home, they can actually sue you...Even though they broke in.
Liberals think all of America should be like California. It's a horrible thought.
Its true, in more ways than one, there is a certain element for whom education and intelligence isn't wanted or needed, they do cling to their guns and religion, they shy away from technology and science.
The fact that guns and religion are interwoven in their thinking is key.
He wasn't putting down gun owners or people who believe in the bible, just the people who have nothing else they believe in.
He said: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And it’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Basically he called them Bible thumping, gun toting, racist hicks.
Totally true, and said in a forum where he was DUMB ENOUGH to think there weren't any cameras running.
It was Mr. Elitist's way of talking down about your ';common folk'; who he claims to represent when he's in your town..... and then who he basically calls rednecks when he's with his Hollywood supporters.
If you took ANY time at all to research Obama, there's no way you could ever support him......
I guess you are just now joining us.
As you will learn...this is only one of several Obama gaffs. However, it's not widely publicized. Might have something to do with a BIG push by the news media to get Obama elected.
Listen to 'The Battle of the Headlines' on the Glenn Beck Radio Show. Absolutely Hillarious!
Full Quote..
';cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them”
Some how people ignore the last part of his quote.He was talking about small town uber-religious, gun toting racists...which I assume most of you are not. Right?
Now if you are a small town uber-religious, gun toting racist...by all means be offended by this.
I support Obama (at least compared to the lunatics on the other side), but he did indeed say this. It was actually used against him by Hillary to try and point out how ';out of touch'; he supposedly was with lower-class America.
Thing is, many people (myself included) actually agreed with it.
He was talking about the people who live in Pennsylvania...in a speech for ultra-liberals in California...during the democratic primary
Yes it is true. He said it at a private fundraiser in San Fransisco but someone taped it and released it. It was right before the Pennsylvania primary..
why would they lie. everything he said is taped by journalists.
Yes, he said it in San Francisco during a fundraiser. He was talking about YOU.
And John McShame was against MLK birthday becoming a holiday.
Not a lie, it came directly from Obama's mouth.
It's true, but I don't like clinging on to religion or guns anyway.
Agree with the above. I've seen the tape many times.
yes he did. the more he speaks the more foot he shoves in his mouth.
yep he said it about ';small town America';.
Yes, he did.
yes he did uit was a reemark about Clinton seeking the votes of bible thumbing gun owners
Jesus wants us to own assault rifles. It's in the Bible!
Is there a connection between a rapid heartbeat and true love?
It only happens when I think of a certain lady lagomorph, and
the cute mole in the meadow across from my hilly cave...is this love or high blood pressure?Is there a connection between a rapid heartbeat and true love?
Yes dear...especially when love is just about to start or just about to end... ;-)Is there a connection between a rapid heartbeat and true love?
It must be love pika chew; i hope it is; as you are so sweet and everyone needs love don;t we??
the cute mole in the meadow across from my hilly cave...is this love or high blood pressure?Is there a connection between a rapid heartbeat and true love?
Yes dear...especially when love is just about to start or just about to end... ;-)Is there a connection between a rapid heartbeat and true love?
It must be love pika chew; i hope it is; as you are so sweet and everyone needs love don;t we??
Is it true that a person who would be considered a 8 on the good looks scale to be with some one who is a 4?
I herd its mathamatically impossible.Is it true that a person who would be considered a 8 on the good looks scale to be with some one who is a 4?
Well everyone is different. Some couples are evenly matched (like Angelina Jolie %26amp; Brad Pitt -- both 10's) others are mismatched as far as attractiveness goes. This could be because beautiful people are not always shallow %26amp; could fall for someone's inner beauty, or maybe the beautiful ones don't want competition %26amp; prefer to be in the spotlight, so they want a plain partner to hide in their shadow? Who knows?
I've been told I'm a 10 %26amp; I've dated people who were 5's %26amp; people who were 10's. A lot of things can make a person attractive aside from their looks. The sound of their voice, the way they smell, the way they feel, their personality, their sense of humour. A person can be sexy without being conventionally attractive. Love is supposed to be blind, right?Is it true that a person who would be considered a 8 on the good looks scale to be with some one who is a 4?
what!!! first off, a ';herd'; is a bunch of sheep... you meant to say ';heard';.... just so you know.... secondly, what does math have to do with love??? what you heard is a bunch of crap.
If the scale is shallow.. The person considered an 8 would only be with a person considered a 10.5. So in lamens terms that person would be alone forever unless he finds himself a really good looking whore.
Looks isn't what makes a good relationship. what you heard is wrong...if you go by the scale you are wrong..
every one has their types. i always see theses real prety nice girls with these not to good looin scoumbages of a guy, some how guys always need the girl to be perfect. i know what i mean?
anyways back to your question there isn't really a good answer to that because one person could look real good to anouther but not to his friend, or some one might be really good looking but know one will be with them because their just not as good on the in side as they might seem on the in. so as long as you like eacher their looks wont matter... i hope.
i mean really what if you marry the hottest girl in high school and then she loses all her hair and good looks and you guys can't even be friends.
P.S. Think about it.
I'm a 10 with a 2...
It depends on whose scale you are going by. Forget the math. It's all about smell, that's right smell. I believe it is called pheromones.
If these two people have intelligence and compassion, it doesn't make a darned bit of difference who is better looking, or if ';either'; of them are.
What the heck does math have to do with two people who are compatible in most ways but ones outside appearance is better looking than the others? I've seen many couples who do not match on the good looks scale and are very happy with each other.
DUDE!!!! YOU WILL NEVER EVER GET A 8!!!!!!!! YOU SUCK!!!!!!!!!!! GO FIND A 1 OR 2!!!! THEY SUIT YOU MORE!!!!!!!!!!
My question to you would be'; Should someone who is an eight on the intelligence scale be with a person is a two or less on the same scale?'; Your ranking is indicated by the fact that you cannot formulate a sentence that clearly conveys what you mean to ask?
the only thing i can gather from your question is something referred to as the 'ladder theory'... which, as far as i'm concerned, makes some humorous sense... but nothing too 'proven' by way of any actual evidence.
as for your question, its really hard to understand exactly what you are asking. i suppose i'd wonder how anyone would be 'graded' -- what basis of comparison each individual would compare against BEFORE i'd concern myself with if it were actually mathematically possible.
now someone else who has read my answer... come along and say just what i said (but in a more refined way) so you come across as brilliant.
*grin*
Looks are not everything ...
Well everyone is different. Some couples are evenly matched (like Angelina Jolie %26amp; Brad Pitt -- both 10's) others are mismatched as far as attractiveness goes. This could be because beautiful people are not always shallow %26amp; could fall for someone's inner beauty, or maybe the beautiful ones don't want competition %26amp; prefer to be in the spotlight, so they want a plain partner to hide in their shadow? Who knows?
I've been told I'm a 10 %26amp; I've dated people who were 5's %26amp; people who were 10's. A lot of things can make a person attractive aside from their looks. The sound of their voice, the way they smell, the way they feel, their personality, their sense of humour. A person can be sexy without being conventionally attractive. Love is supposed to be blind, right?Is it true that a person who would be considered a 8 on the good looks scale to be with some one who is a 4?
what!!! first off, a ';herd'; is a bunch of sheep... you meant to say ';heard';.... just so you know.... secondly, what does math have to do with love??? what you heard is a bunch of crap.
If the scale is shallow.. The person considered an 8 would only be with a person considered a 10.5. So in lamens terms that person would be alone forever unless he finds himself a really good looking whore.
Looks isn't what makes a good relationship. what you heard is wrong...if you go by the scale you are wrong..
every one has their types. i always see theses real prety nice girls with these not to good looin scoumbages of a guy, some how guys always need the girl to be perfect. i know what i mean?
anyways back to your question there isn't really a good answer to that because one person could look real good to anouther but not to his friend, or some one might be really good looking but know one will be with them because their just not as good on the in side as they might seem on the in. so as long as you like eacher their looks wont matter... i hope.
i mean really what if you marry the hottest girl in high school and then she loses all her hair and good looks and you guys can't even be friends.
P.S. Think about it.
I'm a 10 with a 2...
It depends on whose scale you are going by. Forget the math. It's all about smell, that's right smell. I believe it is called pheromones.
If these two people have intelligence and compassion, it doesn't make a darned bit of difference who is better looking, or if ';either'; of them are.
What the heck does math have to do with two people who are compatible in most ways but ones outside appearance is better looking than the others? I've seen many couples who do not match on the good looks scale and are very happy with each other.
DUDE!!!! YOU WILL NEVER EVER GET A 8!!!!!!!! YOU SUCK!!!!!!!!!!! GO FIND A 1 OR 2!!!! THEY SUIT YOU MORE!!!!!!!!!!
My question to you would be'; Should someone who is an eight on the intelligence scale be with a person is a two or less on the same scale?'; Your ranking is indicated by the fact that you cannot formulate a sentence that clearly conveys what you mean to ask?
the only thing i can gather from your question is something referred to as the 'ladder theory'... which, as far as i'm concerned, makes some humorous sense... but nothing too 'proven' by way of any actual evidence.
as for your question, its really hard to understand exactly what you are asking. i suppose i'd wonder how anyone would be 'graded' -- what basis of comparison each individual would compare against BEFORE i'd concern myself with if it were actually mathematically possible.
now someone else who has read my answer... come along and say just what i said (but in a more refined way) so you come across as brilliant.
*grin*
Looks are not everything ...
After a forest fire destroys a forest, what is true of the first species to recolonize the area?
A. Their seeds may be blown by the wind.
B. Pine trees grow first.
C. They are shade tolerant.
D. The organisms are small animals.
E. They are shade intolerant.After a forest fire destroys a forest, what is true of the first species to recolonize the area?
From what I can see, only B. is unlikely to be correct in any situation.
The plants that colonize the area could have been the result of seeds blowing in to the post-burn site, and they may or may not be shade tolerant. Given that they're pioneer species, they're probably (but by no means invariably) shade intolerant. Finally, such areas often do get colonized very early on by small animals, including worms, insects, small mammals, etc.
Added: I agree, if one had to go with only one, then it is likely A, given that the way it is worded. But, I caution that the best course here is to _understand_ why B. is almost never going to be the case, and why all of the others could apply (although very rarely will it be C.).After a forest fire destroys a forest, what is true of the first species to recolonize the area?
A is correct, as it is the only question that does not state an absolute.
B - pine may grow first, but this is not a certainty
C - they may be shade tolerant, they may not
D - There may be small animals, but plants might also come first
E - They may be shade intolerant, but they might not
Many plants and animals have adapted to fire. Both lodgepole pine and jack pine have resin-sealed cones that stay on trees for many years. The heat of fire melts the resin and the cones pop open. Thousands of seeds then scatter to the ground and grow into new stands of pine. Woodpeckers feast on bark beetles and other insects that colonize in newly burned trees.
i would say - A
WTF?????????
B. Pine trees grow first.
C. They are shade tolerant.
D. The organisms are small animals.
E. They are shade intolerant.After a forest fire destroys a forest, what is true of the first species to recolonize the area?
From what I can see, only B. is unlikely to be correct in any situation.
The plants that colonize the area could have been the result of seeds blowing in to the post-burn site, and they may or may not be shade tolerant. Given that they're pioneer species, they're probably (but by no means invariably) shade intolerant. Finally, such areas often do get colonized very early on by small animals, including worms, insects, small mammals, etc.
Added: I agree, if one had to go with only one, then it is likely A, given that the way it is worded. But, I caution that the best course here is to _understand_ why B. is almost never going to be the case, and why all of the others could apply (although very rarely will it be C.).After a forest fire destroys a forest, what is true of the first species to recolonize the area?
A is correct, as it is the only question that does not state an absolute.
B - pine may grow first, but this is not a certainty
C - they may be shade tolerant, they may not
D - There may be small animals, but plants might also come first
E - They may be shade intolerant, but they might not
Many plants and animals have adapted to fire. Both lodgepole pine and jack pine have resin-sealed cones that stay on trees for many years. The heat of fire melts the resin and the cones pop open. Thousands of seeds then scatter to the ground and grow into new stands of pine. Woodpeckers feast on bark beetles and other insects that colonize in newly burned trees.
i would say - A
WTF?????????
Is it true that singers can become a public figure ?
Nowadays, we know that singer or actress usually makes a scandal to attract the public, especially in Indonesia. It's true that it depends on their personalities. But, in common way, most of them, cannot be like that. If we compare present actress with past actress, we can see the differences between them.Is it true that singers can become a public figure ?
YesIs it true that singers can become a public figure ?
yes
Well, maybe not all of them can be a good public figure, but i think some of them can.
For example i think Ruth Sahanaya and Krisdayanti can be a good public figure, because they seem to have a great popularity but they still take good care of their family and they also behave nicely.
YesIs it true that singers can become a public figure ?
yes
Well, maybe not all of them can be a good public figure, but i think some of them can.
For example i think Ruth Sahanaya and Krisdayanti can be a good public figure, because they seem to have a great popularity but they still take good care of their family and they also behave nicely.
Is it true a shot of Jack Daniels will cure a sore throat and cough?
My friend has strep and a cold, and I dono I have heard from some people if you take a shot of Jack Daniels it gets magically true and helps....is it true or false?Is it true a shot of Jack Daniels will cure a sore throat and cough?
Jack Daniels doesn't cure anything, but it can make you feel better about pretty much anything.Is it true a shot of Jack Daniels will cure a sore throat and cough?
No. But a couple of shots will make him not care!
It is not true except to make you a bit happy and relax...the same as hot buttered rum
It definitely would make him feel better and help him sleep.
My f-i-l was an old mexican, and he swore by his ';cough medicine'; made of lemon, honey %26amp; a jigger of tequila.
peppermint schnapps works better.
Can't speak for ol' Black Jack, but I find Southern Comfort helps with coughs and sore throats. It's not a miracle cure by any means, but it usually stops my coughs and takes the edge off a sore throat.
No...it will however help you to feel better, something like nyquil....but cure, no
Jack Daniels doesn't cure anything, but it can make you feel better about pretty much anything.Is it true a shot of Jack Daniels will cure a sore throat and cough?
No. But a couple of shots will make him not care!
It is not true except to make you a bit happy and relax...the same as hot buttered rum
It definitely would make him feel better and help him sleep.
My f-i-l was an old mexican, and he swore by his ';cough medicine'; made of lemon, honey %26amp; a jigger of tequila.
peppermint schnapps works better.
Can't speak for ol' Black Jack, but I find Southern Comfort helps with coughs and sore throats. It's not a miracle cure by any means, but it usually stops my coughs and takes the edge off a sore throat.
No...it will however help you to feel better, something like nyquil....but cure, no
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)